Philosophy as a science

 Philosophy is considered a science, but it is difficult to say when compared to general sciences such as biology or chemistry. This is a burning issue among scientists and linguists around the world. Can philosophy become a science? What does philosophy work for? It works with wide and interchangeable sections. In their field of research, general science operates with very limited definitions. General science uses the laws and regulations of that science to conduct research and, in rare cases, adapt it to others. Philosophy finds meaning in every science that seeks to achieve results.

We cannot call philosophy supra-science because it uses speculation and argument to make opinions. But one thing is clear: philosophy now has laws, and will never exist, because science changes with the age, needs, beliefs, and needs of citizens. To prove your point, you can write an essay and clarify all the facts and arguments you know to prove it. This is a great way to research the problem and see what the solution is. But you need to do careful research; Otherwise the definition essays will not work. The philosophy of all sciences went through stages of its development. Some scientists believe that the cave of philosophy is myth and religion. 

If we examine some life principles and some ancient myths, we can see that this statement is true enough and that philosophy is still evolving from social beliefs and ideas. Philosophy is a science that every college student must learn to establish his or her own philosophy of life. Finding answers to current questions is exciting: Who am I? What do I know, what do I know? what should I do? Here's another interesting review. You can see that all the famous philosophers are doing research in other areas of science. For example, Freud, Jung, and Kafka did research in linguistics and the social sciences. His innumerable works are the pride of human history because he revealed some secrets that he did not discover long before his greatest contributions.

There are many streams and consequences, so many philosophy schools find it difficult to decide which one you want and which one to accept. It depends on the country, family and community in which you live. This is another difference between philosophy and other natural sciences. The law is set for any country; Gravity exists in India as well as in Brazil. Philosophy is a difficult science because it is difficult to understand the meaning of a theory that can only be read once. Sure it's not easy, but if you've been interested in mentioning one of the famous philosophers at a social event somewhere and making a good impression on an educated and intelligent personality you will be credited.

There is a misconception about what is actually involved in a particular branch of literature called science fiction. Spaceships and monsters? Time machines? Galactic Empires? Well, not all of them, and usually none of them.

Science fiction is, for the most part, a story dealing with the impact of organized knowledge on humans. In general, this means technology, the way it changes us and reveals itself about us. After all, most technologies are an extension of our senses, attributes and desires: computers brain, cell phones sounds and ears, cars dreaming of flying legs and planes.

Many great S.F. Movies and books take place in a world similar to ours, except the creation of some new device or new form of life. Others take place in a foreign world that only a very dedicated, experienced reader can understand what is happening!

But in the original, any work with a science fiction label would have three questions or musings that are often asked or explored. They are three:

1) If so?

2) Only then

3) If it continues

Although these three "questions" overlap considerably, the first, if any, is the most essential of the three. If Mars is attacked? What if eternal life is available for a price? What if we knew that an asteroid would hit Earth in a year?

The latter gives little desire to the equation. If only President Kennedy had not been assassinated, it would have been the kind of question that led to sociological and historical speculation or to the non-historical branch of SF. It has become very popular in the last decade. If generosity (or anger or fanaticism) can be forgiven and bad memories can be selectively deleted

If the questions have an emotional quality, they often miss opportunities and speak without going through the motions.

The third question, if it goes away, is relevant to conscious stories. If we continue to pollute the environment, one party will continue to dominate American politics, more women will enter the management class, the space program will continue to privatize, and men will be better at modifying their physical features

These questions have led to speculation. What if a 300-foot-tall radioactive lizard attacked Tokyo? If we have undeniable evidence of intelligent aliens, how can mankind solve such profound problems?

By focusing on the main question or suggestion of your story, it will be easier to prevent it from becoming a CGI-Fest. Ask yourself how you would respond to a particular situation. How your family responds, you know them well. And friends. Political opponents. People from other countries and other groups. Dig the flesh of it. Study history and begin to understand how societies change in response to technology, such as the automobile, or the printing press, or the computer.

The more in-depth you examine, the more likely you are to create a unique question with unique answers. It seems then that there are people in your world who can breathe, trust, and respond intelligently. Your work will thrive and reach new levels

Although it is about 300 feet radioactive lizard!